I heard only the first two comparisons on my laptop speakers, it was extremely obvious which is which and I stopped it. There are some who feel the pianos are mixed between the segments though, and even somebody who thinks B is the acoustic one. The OP on the Pianoteq forum hasn't confirmed, but there as well most people feel the same way. Personally I think the acoustic is A in all of the 5 segments, without being able to say for certain in the last one, due to it's short length. Maybe they simply agreed with the previous posters, or maybe they were a little shy to clearly take a pick, just în case they may be mistaken?! Is sample A Pianoteq ? or is sample A Steinway ?Īctually there were others who said they can clearly hear the Pianoteq tone or speaking of PT's sound signature without mentioning if it's A or B or if in the first section it's a, then b, then a again, etc. Well, it doesn't seem like much of a "gamble" when you have not specified "what it is" you are betting on about sample A. I’ve not heard the samples (a small part or quantity intended to show what the whole is like), but being a gambler by nature, I bet on sample A!
Well said Mario, the most intelligent comment I read about it. It took me almost twenty years to get rid of this addiction. In music, an overly analytical mentality can be the main obstacle to a true understanding and enjoyment of the art. And for the best sound systems, we could elaborate long descriptions, but it was almost impossible to tell what set them apart from others systems. Everybody said the fashionable expressions and it was obvious that almost nobody knew what they were talking about. When I went to audiophile festivals I realized that the translation of words into reality was rather precarious. I have read audiophile magazines for a long time and have found it very easy, and sometimes almost inevitable, to be deceived by our own words. But it could also be the same piano in another room, recorded with another microphone in a distinct position. Is the second Pianoteq because the sound is more "perfect", synthetic, less rich? Maybe. Besides that, it seems to be the same piano in different conditions. Our readers have come to expect excellence from our products, and they can count on us to maintain a commitment to producing rigorous and innovative information products in whatever forms the future of publishing may bring.There is a big difference in the first note you hear. Through our commitment to new products-whether digital journals or entirely new forms of communication-we have continued to look for the most efficient and effective means to serve our readership. Since the late 1960s, we have experimented with generation after generation of electronic publishing tools. The Press's enthusiasm for innovation is reflected in our continuing exploration of this frontier. We were among the first university presses to offer titles electronically and we continue to adopt technologies that allow us to better support the scholarly mission and disseminate our content widely. Among the largest university presses in the world, The MIT Press publishes over 200 new books each year along with 30 journals in the arts and humanities, economics, international affairs, history, political science, science and technology along with other disciplines.
0 kommentar(er)
